Skip to main content

18 posts tagged with "crypto"

View All Tags

· One min read
Iñigo Querejeta Azurmendi

High level summary

The open fronts that the crypto team is working on are:

  • Sidechains: Analysis of Halo2 SNARK verifier to plan a plutus implementation
  • mithril: Full node verifier
  • musig2: Include MuSig2 description in cryptography handbook
  • kes_agent: Finilising test and CI. Working on KES binary

Low level summary

Mithril

  • Full Node Verifier merged #939.

MuSig2

  • Started describing MuSig2 to include it as part of the cryptography handbook

Sidechains

  • Analysis of Halo2 verifier with the goal of implementing SNARK verifier in Plutus. Implemented ad-hoc IPA verifier. Work progress in this fork.

KES agent

  • KES agent is ready:
    • CI ready #19
    • Receipt confirmation message #20
    • KES agent binary ready #21
    • Control client implemented #11

· 4 min read
Iñigo Querejeta Azurmendi

Security Issue Report: SECP256k1 bug

Date Occurred: July 15, 2022 Severity: Potentially Very High if exploited on Mainnet Authors: Iñigo Querejeta Azurmendi

Date of Report: August 17, 2023

Summary of Issue

Criticality Level

Actually low (since the issue was detected prior to deployment) but potentially very high if it had been deployed to mainnet Context

New SECP256k1 Plutus bindings were being introduced in order to support interoperability with other major chains, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. The intention was to deploy these as part of the Vasil hard-fork. The bindings were considered to be a low-security risk since the underlying library functions were well tested and had been deployed on other blockchains. How was the Issue Detected

The issue was detected via specific End-to-End tests that had been commissioned. It was (accidentally) triggered on the Cardano Testnet before a fix could be deployed there.

What Action was Taken

The Cardano Testnet was permanently halted, and new test environments were deployed (Preview and Pre-Prod). Fixes were applied to prevent the use of the primitives. A full security audit was carried out on the bindings. The rollout of the primitives was postponed to a new hard fork (Valentine)

Potential Effect

The potential effect was that an adversary might be able to craft invalid Plutus transactions to crash any node, requiring execution of the Cardano disaster recovery plan to revert to a safe state and bypass the transaction.

Actual Effect

  • Delay to the Vasil hard-fork
  • Temporary removal of SECP256k1 primitives
  • Additional hard-fork to introduce SECP256k1 primitives

Ongoing Mitigations Needed, if any

None

Responsibility for Mitigations

Core team

Detailed description of Incident

New Plutus secp256k1 cryptographic primitives for Plutus v2 failed to apply the necessary validity checks on the input data, meaning that the primitives could theoretically be used in an unsafe environment. The vulnerability was present in recent node versions (1.35.0 onwards), including ones deployed to Cardano Testnet.

The problem was not in the deserialization functions of the underlying library (Bitcoin's library) but rather that the Haskell functions that implemented the Plutus builtins were not calling them correctly. In particular, the library functions were designed to take structured data as input. However, the Haskell FFI implementation that was produced for the Plutus builtins allowed a caller to pass in (possibly) unstructured data. There were no checks that these data were structured in the correct way. This issue was detected during End-to-End testing.

  • This is the ECDSA signature verification algorithm that was used. It takes a SECP256k1_pubkey as input. That type is an opaque type with an expected structure: a parsed and valid public key. It was not immediately obvious that structured data needed to be passed to allow the function to be used safely.
  • The same happened with the Schnorr verification function. It takes as input a SECP256k1_xonly_pubkey, which is again an opaque structure that holds a parsed and valid public key.

The FFI skipped checks over these structured keys and directly passed the raw bytes that were given as arguments. If an adversary were to pass in data that was not properly structured, then it could result in unexpected behavior of the library. This could perhaps translate into an adversary being able to crash the nodes that ran these functions. All nodes in the network could be crashed by a single transaction that would then be executed repeatedly, so stalling the network until the disaster recovery process was initiated.

The fix was addressed in this PR. It consisted of using the external representation that the deserialization function expects and running the deserialization prior to signature verification. This was audited by security experts.

Recommendations

  • Check all new Plutus bindings for correct use.
  • Audit all new Plutus built-in bindings.
  • Continue to develop specific End-to-End tests for all new Plutus features.
  • Do not assume that any existing library functions are "safe". Treat all external calls circumspectly.

· One min read
Iñigo Querejeta Azurmendi

High level summary

The open fronts that the crypto team is working on are:

  • Sidechains: Analysis of Halo2 SNARK verifier to plan a plutus implementation
  • mithril: Full node verifier
  • musig2: Finalised the missing fuzz tests
  • kes_agent: engineer on PTO. Work halted

Low level summary

Mithril

  • Work on a mithril flaky test #1105
  • Keep working on Full Node Verifier #939. Should be merged in the coming week.

MuSig2

  • Finalised the fuzz tests #43

Sidechains

  • Analysis of Halo2 verifier. Necessary for a future implementation of a plutus verifier.

· One min read
Iñigo Querejeta Azurmendi

High level summary

The open fronts that the crypto team is working on are:

  • Sidechains: First version of snark-based ATMS
  • mithril: Full node verifier
  • kes_agent: Keep progress, and prepare CIP and CPS
  • CIPs and community: Finishing BLS12-381 CIP and working on a KECCAK CIP

Low level summary

kes_agent

Mithril

  • Final review of the implementation of Full Node Verifier #939. Included benchmarks and further tests.

Sidechains

  • Schnorr signature implemented
  • ATMS signature implemented
  • First benchmarks show that for the committe size we expect, we need 2^21 constraints.

CIPs and community

  • Addressed some review comments in #PR506
  • Worked with the communityt on #PR524 to include Keccak as part of the next Plutus release.

· One min read
Iñigo Querejeta Azurmendi

High level summary

The open fronts that the crypto team is working on are:

  • cardano-base: E2E tests for BLS bindings and KES agent
  • Sidechains: Implement ECC chip and Rescue hash primitives for ATMS
  • mithril: Full node verifier

Low level summary

cardano-base

  • RawBearer API in ouroboros-network-framework (https://github.com/input-output-hk/ouroboros-network/pull/4395); blocked due to issue with windows' localSnocket. Trying to resolve.
  • Adapting cardano-base for direct memory transfers between mlocked RAM and file descriptors #317.
  • Above, blocked by the simplification of typeclasses #404.
  • Provided e2e test cases to the testing team with aggregated signatures and schnorr signatures for the BLS bindings

Mithril

  • Implementation of Full Node Verifier #939

Sidechains

  • ECC chip implemented for JubJub over BLS12-381
  • Rescue chip implemented for hashing.
  • Currently working on Schnorr signature (which uses the above constraints)